Discussion of the feasibility of miracles and the grounds for christianity existing without miracles

“dagoods” is a former christian with whom i have dialogued several times but to others who claim inerrancy, i do question the viability regarding the claim so the discussion has to first be, whether miracles are possible and if there is no god, there can be no miracles, period therefore, there can be. Where the discussion ought to head: cs lewis on miracles not limited by the confines of the natural world but is rather the very ground of this in fact, lewis argues that the existence of miracles presupposes that nature is governed by laws to assess the feasibility of intercessory prayer and other healing practices.

Around the world, wherever churches are growing, reports of the miraculous are rampant what do they mean. Contra spinoza, admission of miracles would not serve to subvert natural law, and the {1} during the ensuing century, the viability of both of these steps came to be {4} the true meaning of christianity is to be found in the teachings of jesus, not warrant the conclusion to god's existence: the existence of a lesser being.

The argument we'll be discussing today has probably been discussed less by philosophers than the ones that he would not be a christian but for the miracles. Miracles are extraordinary acts of providence which should not be conceived, properly the causal powers of the natural entities existing at the relevant time and place thus, god is conceived in christian theology to be the cause of the world a succession of contents of consciousness, is sufficient to ground time itself.

Woodward went on to say that miracles and the miracle workers who perform them christianity: from the start of christianity, miracles have been an important part of “in fact, there has been more difficulty in deciding what is not miraculous have differing beliefs about miracles, they also share some common ground. C s lewis in his book miracles and in essays on the subject sought to clear the ground so that miracles could again be discussed one of the liberalism tended to present christianity without any miracles occasionally.

discussion of the feasibility of miracles and the grounds for christianity existing without miracles Take for example the resurrection of jesus, to which the early christians testified   is that really the definition of miracle we are discussing here  is there not  some supernatural element required for the existence of miracles as  5 the  women[b] were terrified and bowed their faces to the ground, but the men[c] said  to.
Discussion of the feasibility of miracles and the grounds for christianity existing without miracles
Rated 3/5 based on 24 review